Online Targeting is Less Efficient Study Says

As technology continues to grow and the internet becomes a more common platform for business (believe it or not, many businesses still haven’t harnessed the internet), the amount of money spent on online ads has become, as you can imagine, fairly substantial. Although online advertising can be a more efficient way to target certain demographics than traditional media outlets, this does not always lead to greater results. According to a new study from MIT Sloan School of Management, the same search, and other technology, that has enabled advertisers to target particular audiences, such as men between 25 and 35 who work on Mac computers, is also creating greater online competition for the same audience, thus reducing profitability of advertising on any targeted web site.

If you think about it, this all makes all the sense in the world. And it isn’t enough that many online advertisers have only themselves to blame for fragmenting their own markets by hopping from one sexy technology or site to another, but now there is evidence that there is a finite amount of scree-estate available to compete for the attention of the viewer.

MarketingVox data suggest that the study’s findings take on greater relevance as vertical and hyper vertical ad networks continue to grow. Adify’s Vertical Gauge for Q3, brand advertising CPMs for various verticals continue to rebound from early 2009. Also, food CPMs are up 91% from last quarter and Real Estate CPMs are up 17%. As far as vertical brand advertising, both automotive and healthy living and lifestyle verticals contracted substantially.

Clearly this article suggests to advertisers and consumers alike that targeted ad dollars don’t necessarily create more efficacy or revenue, in fact, evidence, in this case, shows more targeted ad dollars are less profitable. It is critical that advertisers note the importance of integrated marketing strategies in their marketing communications campaigns…more to come.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Market Like a Champ Investor

I started my career working for legendary stock picker and investor Mario Gabelli. In my brief stint at Gabelli’s Rye, N.Y.-based firm, I learned much that has stuck with me to this day, including the basics of value investing. Value investing is about kicking the tires, doing your research from the ground up, and carefully evaluating a company and its stock based on its intrinsic value… before you pony up one dime for shares.

Value investing also looks at businesses in their totality and, just as importantly, over the long term. No flipping stocks, no short-term trades; value investors are overwhelmingly in it for the long run.

The era of managing quarter to quarter is over. If you’re in business, surely you’re in it for the long term, right? So your business, including your marketing approach, ought to reflect that reality. No one doubts Gabelli’s success, just as we all love to hear from Warren Buffet, the renowned value investor, pontificate about his latest corporate conquest. Both Buffet and Gabelli run their businesses the same way they invest: with an eye on value and for long-term success.What can we learn from these legendary investors about marketing and promotion? Here are four suggestions to include in your marketing plans that will deliver real value for your business:

Kick the Tires: Do your homework on marketing, including media. Not all media are created equal relative to your products, services, customers, and geographic service area. Take time to review all options before investing a medium. And because media companies are recognizing that we are in the age of engagement, many are providing advertisers with more venues to reach customers. They may include websites, networking opportunities, and direct mail, in addition to its core business offers. So do your homework on media and negotiate a good deal.

Avoid Marketing Bombs: Without a marketing plan, you’re dropping marketing bombs and wasting your hard-earned money. Recently, a CEO of a $500-million firm that sells telecommunications equipment said of his marketing: “Yeah, we got that idea, we tried it, and it didn’t work.” When I asked him about the context of that particular tactic within an overall campaign and why it did not work, he replied, “What campaign?” A tactical approach to marketing is far less effective than a strategic one, so invest in and employ market-driven strategy. Then measure your strategy in its entirety; don’t simply examine one tactic, no matter how important.

Know that People Buy From People: Bring your business out of the office. Target trade shows that have a close affinity to your firm. Investing in trade shows goes far beyond having a nice booth. It’s a great chance to network with other businesses, each a potential client. Trade shows allow you to measure yourself against the competition.

In addition, invest in opportunities to make personal connections, such as the simple act of taking potential clients to dinner. It may sound clichéd, but it’s the blocking and tackling that allows you to move down the field with consistency, and not the 60-yard “Hail Mary.” Very often, personal connections win more business than 9-to-5 sales tactics.

Do Good, Do Well: In the 1980s, American Express developed a unique campaign for their customers to help restore the Statue of Liberty. A penny for each use of the American Express card and $1 for each new card were donated to the Statue of Liberty Restoration campaign. In four months, $2 million was raised and, more importantly to American Express, its transaction activity increased by 28 percent. So integrating social causes into your marketing strategy will surely allow you to “do good”—while doing well.

PLAN FOR THE LONG RUN: The above are value-based tactics that should be included in your overall marketing plans. Don’t rely on one approach. Delivering value through marketing is ensuring that you integrate your tactics with business-driven strategy. So, if you agree with me that we’re in a new era of customer engagement, you’ll give your marketing plan a second look. If you don’t have a plan, build one around adding value to your business. And remember, that plan must deliver value to your market not just for now, but for the long run.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Social Networking, Marketing, & PR. Brief Interview with FIOS1

Here’s a brief interview with FIOS1 about social networking.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

The Social Networking Trap

The rush to social networking is an interesting phenomenon. We watch with amazement as people flock to facebook, twitter et. al. and the offline social pressure that ensues to get on these sites. The business implications are plenty, from the demise of newspapers, to the rise of social networking, how does capitalize on these sizemic shift in the tectonic plates of media?  Here are some ideas to ponder:

1. Social networking online is like social networking offline. I can’t tell you how many people I know attend trade shows, networking events and come back with a stack of business card that just there. The key to any networking, on or offline is the “next.”  What do you with that valuable information? How do you use it? When? For what?  So online social networking is more about your behavior than the technology. If you’re a natural networker offline, you’ll probably know just what to do online.

2. “Own” a social networking site - like a good media planner, aggregate your efforts on where your market is and focus on learning the social networking environment and make it work for you. Own the medium.  For example, if the majority of your target market is on Linkedin, get on that site and work that site. Do not dilute your efforts by attempting to do the same on facebook, myspace…your market simply isn’t there.

3. Social networking sites have become destinations with emotional attachments. People will have a hard time leaving, unless something drastic happens like a serious breach of privacy or the sites become fee driven. Even if that happens, I believe that these properties will prosper (perhaps not financially, but will be around in one form or another as utilities).

4. Your network is key - building your online network on social networking properties is the foundation for everything you will do.  If you have relevant contacts whom you can engage, then you have a distinct advantage.

5. Do not abuse your network - remember you do not have a right to your clients, so bombarding them with emails, and offers may turn them away from your online network. Respect that this is their space too.

6. Integrate social networking sites where possible to get the biggest bang for the buck - for example, facebook has a twitter app that allows twitter to be updated whenever you update facebook, saving you time and extending your reach.

There is so much more to share, I am thinking of launching a social networking advisory for our firm. I’ll keep you posted.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Content Distribution - The 800 LB Gorilla in The Room…

The internet as a medium is old news. Yes, it’s the most revolutionary medium in the history of man, but it’s old news. The good news is that we continue to discover how to use the internet to connect with consumers, build businesses, expand brands, and engage markets.  The 800 lb gorilla is content distribution strategy, which is how business get as much relevant exposure as possible across markets and demographics on the net. And why is that important? Well, think of your website as space sitting on your URL. And while you’re promoting the site in various way on and offline, there are ways to repackage your existing content and position it across the web.

Here’s an example:

Let’s say your site has video and 15 pages of static content. Think about the high value of relevant link-backs and create a channel on Youtube and upload your videos there, create a blog on blogger and recreate your content there…and use that blog as a platform going forward to update your customers on your products, business etc. Now, with a little effort, your site’s exposure just got exponentially more powerful.

Most importantly, continue to look for new ways to get your content out there where your customers aggregate and where you can get those valuable linkbacks…it’ll keep you one step ahead of your comeptition.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Web Analytics Refresher…How Good Is Your Site?

Just a refresher of the Peterson Model of online audience engagement. Your site’s usability is the foremost issue, so usability (and a couple of other simple elements) is the road to a transforming your site into an experience…

Check out what by Kevin Mannion had to say about usability in his column on Thursday, July 24, 2008 in Online Publishing Insider:

1. Click Depth: Do users know your wonderful content is there in the first place? Do they know how to easily find it?

2. Loyalty: Does the overall experience generate a strong desire to return often?

3. Interactivity: What makes your users passionate enough to generate content, post comments, forward content to friends or colleagues?

How does your site measure against these standards?

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Today, I am starting a new series of interviews with some of the leading business minds in the nation. Today’s interview is with Jim Barrood, Executive Director of Fairleigh Dickenson University’s Rothman Institute of Entrepreneurial Studies.

 AK - Jim, you’ve interviewed some of the world’s most successful CEOs and entrepreneurs, can you identify for us 3 common elements that these folks share?

JB - Determination and passion to follow through, whether in a new venture, difficult economic periods, merger, it’s about execution. 2. Building a team of loyal and smarter people than you are who can be trusted with implementing your plan / vision. 3. Ability to lead and motivate people via strong relationships.

AK - With regard to business growth and the current state of the economy, what are you seeing right now in terms of how businesses are faring?

JB - In general the picture is grim. We are amidst a perfect storm of negative factors ranging from high energy prices, higher costs, depressed real estate, rising foreclosures, stock market turbulence, lower net worth, higher debt and thus lower consumer confidence, resulting in economic insecurity and less spending by consumers and businesses alike, resulting in a domino effect that is slowing the economy. Everyone is tightening his belts. However, it is important to note that some sectors are faring well, like those relating to the energy sector and to a lesser degree healthcare; exporting companies are also seeing increased opportunity with the devalued dollar.

AK - With the fragmentation of media and with respect to advertising, how are businesses leveraging new communications models to grow market share?

JB - Most are not investing as they should in new media. Granted companies must be willing to take a few limited risks and engage in trial and error experimentation. As the economy continues its downward spiral, I expect more small companies to dedicate the time, if not much money, to try to leverage the marketing opportunities in this sector because it’s important to stay out in front of your customers and markets during times like this. Customers will remember that when the economic climate turns and will likely choose you over the competition, if your competitor chooses to be out of the market during this time.

AK - Where does innovation fit in this equation?

JB - Companies will need to continue to invest in innovation efforts to introduce new products and services to stay ahead of the global competition as well as a way to cut costs on their back end operations. Marketing and public relations is undergoing a radical change due to the internet, and many businesses will need to figure out how to innovate in this space or risk loosing market share.

AK - Let’s talk marketing in specifics here. What can businesses do to stay relevant and perhaps increase market share in a slowing economy?

JB - Take this opportunity to better understand your customer needs and see what else you can offer them in the way of new products and services. Also, investigate if there are other avenues of reaching your market. If you can diversify your offerings to target an under served market or leverage your brand, reputation, etc. to upsell or cross sell your current customers, that may ultimately be a successful strategy and yield more revenues in the short term and contribute to significant long term growth. Also, study your marketing efforts and see what is truly working; modify your plan and invest in what is working best.

AK - What business book are you reading right now?

JB - The Execution Premium by Kaplan and Norton

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Recession Can Be a Marketer’s Friend! Couldn’t Have Said It Better Myself…Thank You Ad Age

 

This article appeared in Ad Age today- here’s a link to the site - http://adage.com/article?article_id=125877

 

From Soap Operas to IPods: History Suggests Slumps Spawn Innovation

 

By Jack Neff

 

Published: March 24, 2008

BATAVIA, Ohio (AdAge.com) — The massive bailout of Bear Stearns from the brink of bankruptcy could be the first of many financial rescues needed. Despite double-digit plunges, U.S. housing is still overpriced by historical yardsticks. Retail sales have gone from slow to declining, and the consumer-spending binge that propped up the U.S. economy for years may not return for a long time.

 

Previous recessions have provided big opportunities — spawning the brand-management system, soap operas, modern cable networks, airline loyalty programs, the IBM personal computer, the iPod, Crest Whitestrips, Axe body spray and — for better or worse — fast-food value menus.

 

But as any old-timer could tell you, quite correctly, today’s marketers don’t know much about marketing through recessions — or how good they have it when things feel so bad.

 

Short slumps 

The past two downturns have been among the shortest on record: eight months each. They followed two of the longest economic expansions on record: 92 months and 120 months. That compares with the average recession of 14 months and average recovery of only 46 months.

 

Gut-wrenching news, layoffs and budget cuts aside, history shows recessions have been some of the best times for media and marketing innovation. For marketers who kept their wits, economic valleys — the deeper the better, in fact — became foundations of empires.

 

Two years into the Great Depression in 1931, a Procter & Gamble Co. executive named Neil McElroy wrote the memo that ushered in the brand-management system. It eventually helped propel him to the presidency of P&G. It wasn’t a cure-all. During the first three years of the Great Depression, P&G’s sales fell by more than half, from $192 million to $94 million, and earnings fell 50%, to $11 million. (Deflation accounted for some of that decline.)

 

But P&G didn’t lay off anyone during the Depression. And it charged ahead with innovation. In 1933 it launched the first radio soap opera nationally and its first synthetic detergent brand, Dreft.

 

Around to cover such events were Advertising Age, launched seemingly inopportunely in 1930, and BusinessWeek, launched at the outset of the Depression, in 1929.

 

New downturns, new networks

You don’t need to go that far back to find successful media launches or marketing initiatives during recessions. During the next-deepest downturn of the 20th century, the 1980-82 double-dip recession, Ted Turner founded CNN in 1980, and MTV launched a year later. By the time the economy began rebounding, those networks were poised to reshape media for a generation.

 

Less glamorously perhaps, airlines reeling from a recession-fueled downturn developed what would become a new marketing currency as American Airlines and Delta Air Lines launched miles-based loyalty programs in 1981.

 

Ronald Reagan, who essentially reinvented the marketing of politics as he realigned the political landscape, did so not coincidentally in 1980, during a respite of weak growth between two recessions. Franklin Roosevelt, did the same a little less than five decades earlier during the Depression.

 

Even the ultimately short recession in 2001 brought two notable media innovations, all the more notable because they emerged from the flaming wreckage of the dot-com bubble.

 

Wikipedia was conceived in January 2001 and rolled out over the course of the year. Of course, with no apparent revenue model, it’s somewhat, um, recession-proof. But it did spawn a plethora of revenue-generating open-source media.

 

Tech picks up

In October 2001, only 42 days after Sept. 11, Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPod. It wasn’t an instant success, as compatibility issues with PCs led to one of the highest post-holiday return rates in consumer-electronics history, said Rob Enderle, principal of the Enderle Group. But by 2002, it was still well on its way to reinventing portable media and music.

 

Indeed, recessions have been salad days for technology. Just about 20 years earlier, during another recession in August 1981, Apple’s nemesis, the IBM personal computer, ushered in a new era in home and business computing. Arguably, the productivity and information revolutions it helped spawn did much to make subsequent recessions shorter and expansions longer.

 


e="font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; margin: 0px">OK, that’s technology. As everyone knows, recessions kill other sectors, such as automotive. Right?

 

Wrong. The mid-1970s recession, spawned by the first energy crisis, produced an entire new segment of imported fuel-efficient cars in the U.S. During a recession in 1981, Lee Iacocca turned around Chrysler through the launch of fuel-efficient K-Cars (albeit backed by government loan guarantees).

 

And in 1991, in part because the recession lowered fuel prices, sales of SUVs rose 55% to more than 1 million units. SUV sales kept rising at a double-digit compound annual pace for a decade, quadrupling to 4.2 million by 2002.

 

Here come the hybrids

Ironically, of course, that contributed to rising gas prices today and current double-digit declines in SUV sales. It’s not obvious how a combination of declining consumer spending, tighter debt standards and rising fuel prices could spawn a new automotive segment this time, though hybrids and super-efficient vehicles are an obvious guess.

 

Recessions also have been fertile ground for some retail chains. Home Depot opened its first two stores near Atlanta just before a recession in 1979. But it expanded the concept rapidly as the economy headed south, going public in 1981 and using the proceeds to build 100 stores by 1989.

 

On the brink of the early-1990s recession, corporate raider Robert Campeau took Federated Department Stores in a leveraged buyout and quickly shed its Gold Circle and Richway high-end discount chains in 1989. Rival Dayton Hudson bought many of the units, which it used to push its similarly styled Target into new territory during the 1990-91 recession.

 

Wal-Mart Stores used the opportunity to charge into markets Gold Circle had vacated in the Midwest. And Wal-Mart’s ruthless efficiency, merchandising savvy and value-conscious consumers made the early 1990s the fastest-growing period in the retailer’s history, with same-store sales up 10% to 11% each year from 1990 to 1992.

 

Expansion

A decade later, the 2001 recession similarly helped fuel the national expansion of Wal-Mart rivals Dollar General and Family Dollar.

 

Hard times have spawned seminal innovation even for the finance industry. Charles Schwab founded his discount brokerage during a recession in 1974. The first interest-bearing (negotiable order of withdrawal) accounts launched in 1972 and spread rapidly in Massachusetts during the same recession. They won nationwide authorization during another recession in 1981.

 

That same recession’s high interest rates spawned legislation authorizing adjustable-rate mortgages nationally in 1982. Of course, those helped spawn the current mess — and a new opportunity for yet-unnamed financial instruments to help fix it.

 

While consumer staples might seem immune to business cycles, the reality is that the recessions of the early 1980s brought on the generics craze, and another in the early 1990s brought another surge in private labels and helped spark a rolling series of restructurings of such giants as Kraft Foods and P&G throughout the decade.

 

Yet recessions also have spawned launches of highly successful and pricey new brands, such as Kimberly-Clark Corp.’s Pull-Ups training pants in the early 1990s. It was probably the biggest risk K-C had ever taken, said former Chairman-CEO Wayne Sanders in a 2002 interview. It was also one that rival P&G considered, rejected as too small an opportunity, then later regretted not taking, Chairman-CEO A.G. Lafley has said.

 

Huge risks, rewards

But the last recession, under Mr. Lafley, spawned two of the most expensive products in P&G’s history: Crest Whitestrips and Swiffer WetJet, both launched nationally in 2001 at prices near $50. And though both brands ultimately cut prices by half or more to expand their market or meet competitive threats, they still established new, high-margin categories they still dominate.

 

WetJet launched less than three weeks after Sept. 11, recalled Maurice Coffey, a P&G marketing director who led the launch as a brand manager, in a 2006 interview. “Quite amazingly,” he said, “we were on track come January on our sales numbers.” He credited extensive prelaunch buzz and the product’s inherent appeal with helping it overcome the economic headwinds.

 

Amid an economy still reeling from that recession, Unilever launched Axe body spray in 2002, establishing a new category priced about 50% above existing deodorant sticks. The recession “made the stakes higher,” said David Rubin, brand manager on the U.S. launch and now director of U.S. hair-care marketing for Unilever. “Consumers are forced to make tougher choices when the economy is bad, and the role of marketing just gets amplified.”

 

Following a better-than-expected year in 2001, the U.S. business got a waiver on profit requirements from London to allow for an expensive launch expected to take three years to pay out, said Charles Strauss, who was president of the North American home and personal-care business at the time. Ultimately, the economy didn’t factor into the launch decision, he said, and Axe came in ahead of Unilever’s sales and profit forec
asts regardless.

 

Charging ahead

Marketers should draw lessons from such examples of charging ahead despite recession, said Ed Rensi, former CEO of McDonald’s USA through the early 1990s recession; he’s now a motivational speaker, Nascar team owner and director of several companies.

 

Unfortunately, he said, companies usually do just the opposite. They cut staff, which he said leaves those left behind overworked and risk-averse. And they cut marketing, which props up profits short term but erodes market share down the road.

 

In his case, McDonald’s lost market share in the early 1990s, in part to Taco Bell, which gained share with national advertising of its value menu (see story, P.1). But by continuing to invest in new stores and remodels through the period, Mr. Rensi said, McDonald’s came out stronger — and in a position where it didn’t have to rely on discounting to build business.

 

Likewise, he said, McDonald’s focus on new products and customer experience over discounts will continue to pay off.

 

“My response has always been that when you go through periods of stress, that’s when you really have to go after top-notch, high-quality people,” he said, “and really go out and market like crazy.”

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Branding Is BS…Yup, You Heard Me….Part II

By Abe Kasbo

So I’ve received many reactions to my previous post branding is bullshit…they range from skepticism to outright hostility…either way I stand by my position. Look branding is a powerful thing and we all know it. However, small businesses have looked at branding through the lens filter of Coca Cola, McDonald’s, IBM, and others who have not only been in the market forever, but have the necessary resources to spend on advertising, conferences, public relations, and other marketing communications avenues to deliver and extend their brand. And the usual way of looking at this type of branding is through the filter of advertising - the most visible of any branding element. And that’s where small and middle market companies ($5 million - $500 million in revenue) get into a false sense of what branding really is and how to brand their companies.

It’s fashionable for marketing communications people position themselves as brand champions, or branding companies - not to say that these folks do don’t good work - but it is what the market wants to hear, rather than what the market needs. In essence branding has become a Brand with a capital B. I’ve participated in seminars about brand DNA, core branding, brand extensions, and inevitably at the end of these sessions, participants walk out with the following collective thought “we need better branding.”

But what does that mean? My branding is BS position comes down to these things:

1. Branding has become it’s own brand…it’s easy to understand. Advertising people and marketing types use it because it’s an easy sell and let’s face it, if you do it right, can deliver a sharp competitive advantage.
2. Branding is a mélange of elements that have to be executed over time and is rarely achievable in the near-term
3. Branding is hard work and it may mean anything from exploring cultural phenomena and its affects on your business to your key marketing messages and value to the market place.
4. Branding is a result of what you do, not what you.
5. Branding is about your customers, more than it is about your business.
6. Branding is more about execution of targeted activities than concepts…so draw up the play, but then put the ball in the basket.
7. Branding is about integration of values that you project into the market place and then embraced by your customers, and therefore you must tell a story that forges lasting emotional connections.

So if you’re a small and middle market business, branding ought to be at the forefront of your marketing goals. Be sure to start with an integrated marketing communications plan, and execute against it…only then will you be on your way to brand nirvana.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

Where To Invest Your Marketing Dollars?

By Abe Kasbo

So the CMO of Proctor and Gamble did it, so did his peer at American Express. And in February of 2006, John Stratton, VP & CMO of Verizon who controls a budget of more than $2 Billion bluntly warned “major money is going to be in motion in the next decade and yet no one understands exactly where it will land, or even if will land, or just disappear altogether.”

Mr. Stratton is referring to Madison Avenue’s love affair with existing media, “antiquated media plans,” and its apparent inability to capitalize on a variety realities including, media fragmentation, the Internet, brand loyalty shifts, and the changing American demographic scene.

So what’s happening? It appears that advertisers are lauding the Internet, but still are unable to make sense out of it. Kind of puzzling though considering Google’s meteoric rise - if that indeed can be used as a measure. If you’re American Express, Coca Cola, your fully invested in your marketing plans, but where do you get the biggest bang for the buck? Where and how do allocate your budget in an increasing wired world? And what do you make of the mobile web?

Media will change rapidly and the next medium is right around the corner. Regardless, this continues to be an issue of asset allocation, messaging, and consumer engagement. It’s those advertisers that can consistently bring those elements together that will be fully invested in the market - smartly.

So with that in mind, advertising firms need to step up and partner with their clients utilizing a different financial model to continue to expand their business and deliver more value to their clients.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Older Posts »