The Auto Industry’s Communications Follies…

I was on fakeation (that’s a working vacation for the uninitiated), when my eyes turned to the television to catch Ford’s new advertising campaign.  The new ads feature Ford’s new tagline, “Drive the Ford Difference.”  But that’s not all, “Different is good,” they say.  Now with all the hurdles that Ford has to overcome, Ford is selling us “Driving the Ford Difference.”  I don’t know what that means, but I’m a good sport, I’ll play.  OK Ford, what is driving Ford difference?  If you can explain it beyond a tagline, I might be interested.  How does the Ford difference engage the customer? Was anyone at Ford’s advertising/MarCom department asking this question?

Once again we’re subjected to mass communications lip service, the same came from General Motors‘ recent “inspiring” video.  In this video, accompanied by iconic images of American flags, city scapes, Pittsburgh Steelers Ben Roethlisberger’s Superbowl pass, GM seeks to “to be completely honest…start over in order to get stronger.” And another thing, GM wants us to know that they are “not going out of business,” but instead “is getting down to business…”

Once again, Madison Avenue and those buying Madison Avenue to continue to fail both the Auto Industry and the American Public.  Here’s how it probably went down (with the GM video):

Madison Avenue:  (this guy is wearing a pink open collar shirt with hair a little messed up, cause he’s creative…speaks real fast) Look, we need to appeal to the American public, so we’ll need a video of the Superbowl, Detroit skyline, and a bunch of robots building cars, sparks everywhere.  Strong, deep voice, authoritative.  We’ll use technology like Youtube, and it’ll be viral…and it’ll show the government and our investors we’re serious about this. What do you think?

GM Marketing Guy:  We’ve gotta do something fast, yeah, sounds good…

GM Marketing Guy’s Staff: (this is probably what they were thinking, but they didn’t say anything, because if they did they wouldn’t be team players)  Dude, what about the actual product, our finances, and actually selling cars? How do we do that, Madison Avenue?

I would be wary with businesses who lead with communications instead of good products.  Rebuilding brands, if that indeed is your direction, starts with rebuilding your products and business, not a one hit wonder PR video release. In Amazon’s most recent shareholder meeting, CEO Jeff Bezos said: “Advertising is the price you pay for having an unremarkable product or service.” Now, some may consider this media fodder, and Madison Avenue may have been offended by the statement, but as it applies to the American Automotive industry…if the shoe fits.  And now, the American Auto industry seems to be taking it’s own advertising to an unremarkable, new low.

Here some suggestions to ponder:

1. With all the technologies and brainpower resources available to both the automotive industry and their advertising firms, Ford and GM ought to invest business driven MarCom initiatives that engage people and drive people to their hard working dealerships.

2. Redefine the objectives of these campaigns to create more connections with the consumer.

3.  Develop a serious strategy to convert non-customers (meaning non-GM or Ford customers).  This would an on and offline strategy, and may or may not be advertising driven.

4. Continue to reach newly minted drivers. Get them young, satisfy them, and perhaps they become your brand champs.

5. Capitalize on the dealer’s strong local relationships by spending local dollars more effectively – perhaps helping local dealers upgrade dealer TV commercials produced by cable companies, that undermine both the national brand and the dealer’s brand. Or assisting the dealer by vetting marketing plans & not advertising plans to help drive business.

One last thing…I’d like to suggest that the American Auto Industry needs a chief marketing officer who is more connected to the products and consumer than Madison Avenue.  This person, let’s use the vernacular of the day to call him or her, the Auto Marketing Czar, would be responsible for the deployment of business driven MarCom initiatves to communicate the real value of American cars to the public, and perhaps that will make all “the difference.”

The American Auto Industry has the responsibility to its dealers, customers, and investors to step up their marketing strategy to truely reflect its business aspirations, and it has the resources to do it.

Come on Detroit, step up…take the challenge…we want you to succeed.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

Druggies, Lipitor, and Their Agents

Abe Kasbo

He is the Michael Jordan of the chest cavity…and a peddler of Pfizer’s cholesterol drug, Lipitor. For the past 2 years, this non-practicing MD, Dr. Robert Jarvik, has lent his name and his fame to Pfizer and now Congress wants some answers. So what?

For starters, this ad campaign is the equivalent of Gatorade’s “Be Like Mike” Campaign. “Be Like Mike Jarvik” that is…take Lipitor, you can run, row, hang out with your son…and if Dr. Jarvik, a heart expert, is doing it, perhaps you should too. Dr. Jarvik is not a cardiologist, but he invented the artificial heart. How he went from that to a pitching for the druggies is beyond me…a new low.

It’s time to stop. Hey big pharma and your pitch people, I am sure your research tells you that the majority of your audience did not go to medical school, so bombarding them with brand name drugs only puts pressure on the docs to subscribe, right folks? It’s makes a mocry of medicine and of the audience because now suddenly every dick, jane and harry (steve too), is talking about your drugs, and recommending to their friends like their favorite shampoo.

I find this amazing considering Americans are sold on the false perception that they have the best healthcare on the planet, and big pharma is spending billions on marketing. Don’t get me wrong, as a marketer, I welcome advertising and marketing, as long as we cut out the BS. There are other ways to market drugs, advertising is certainly one way, another would be by educating physicians on their benefits and side effects and providing consumer information on the web or in brochure form.

According to nytimes.com, since coming under fire, Dr. Jarvik recently stated on his website, “I believe the process of educating the public is beneficial to many patients, and I am pleased to be part of an effort to reach them.” [author's note - Que? What? Is this Dr. Phil?] Where do I start respond to that statement? What “process of education” is he talking about?

This is advertising Dr. Jarvik not community health.

Now it’s Pfizer’s spin mister’s turn…check out this quote from The New York Times Article: “Pfizer stands behind its consumer advertising for Lipitor and our work with Dr. Jarvik to deliver important information on managing heart health,” the company said in an e-mailed statement. “Our primary concern in all of our advertising is that the tone and content are appropriate for the intended audiences, and that it will ultimately result in encouraging valuable patient/physician dialogue that can lead to appropriate treatment.”

Allow me to interpret sil vous plais (that’s French for please for your non Francophiles)…Pfizer will sell Lipitor how it pleases. Pfizer shall use phrases like “managing heart health…encouraging valuable patient/physician dialogue” to ensure that you know that they care about you and to make sure that you buy Lipitor…Ask your doctor folks, ask your doctor…

Since coming under fire, Dr. Jarvik recently stated on his website, “I believe the process of educating the public is beneficial to many patients, and I am pleased to be part of an effort to reach them.” [author's note - Que? What? Is this Dr. Phil?] Where do I start respond to that statement? What process of education is he talking about?

Look, big pharma is not in the public health business, they are in business to sell drugs. There’s nothing wrong with advertising, and these guys are entitled to advertise and make money. But let’s keep honesty as a big part of the game…Consumers and marketers ought to demand it.

Oh and note to whoever makes that restless leg syndrome drug (see you haven’t advertised enough). My friends told about the upcoming restless leg syndrome epidemic. So I got worried the other day when I found my leg shaking a bit for no reason. So I ignored it, and it went away.

Whew, that was close!

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

Advertising May Bring ‘Em In, But Customer Care Keeps ‘Em

By Abe Kasbo

This is the tale of 2 stores, or so it seems. The first has a first class integrated advertising campaign, both visually stunning and memorable campaigns across all media. The other isn’t quite that prolific with their advertising, it’s a bit more expensive and we get some direct mail from the place every once in a while. So when my wife and I needed some items last weekend, we decided to go to the former rather than the latter because of Cesar. Yes Cesar.

You see, brand recognition is no match for Cesar. And while Cesar laughs in the face of frequency and reach, because he can only help one customer at a time, Cesar prevails. Hail Cesar!!!

Cesar delivers excellent customer service, and time and again, he has delivered my business to his employer, Lord & Taylor in the Willowbrook Mall in Wayne, NJ. Yes, he’s a real person with a genuine approach to customer service that accompanies a winning smile.

At this store, Cesar is everywhere and in every department. While Cesar works in the men’s department, there’s a clone in every department. No matter when I go, day or night, sale or no sale, my experience with the people of this store has consistently been nothing short of excellent. And that’s what keeps me coming back. Talk about social marketing!

It is in the ability to replicate a great experience, through their people, that Lord & Taylor broke through my advertising obsessed biased. Consistent, excellent experiences at the store trumped any Madison Avenue cool, chic ad campaign…in my mind anyway.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

NBC Refunds Advertisers, Cats Shacking Up With Dogs.

Filed under: Advertising,Online Marketing,marketing strategy — Tags: , , , , Abe @ 7:40 pm December 11, 2007

By Abe Kasbo

What gives? While some outlets routinely provide make good for failing to reach guaranteed audience levels, The Tiffany Network is dolling out cash to the tune of $500,000 for each advertiser. This unprecedented move seems puzzling yet impressive.

While I’m still trying to make sense of this move, it makes me think about what newspapers have to say. Afterall, newspaper circulation is down significantly across the board. So why do their rates keep climbing?

It’s time for newspapers to adjust their ad prices to reflect dwindling circulation.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn

Media Synergy Is Important – Part I.

By Abe Kasbo:

We often advise our clients to strategically “own” media. In other words, develop a media plan within the overall marketing plan that allows enough frequency of your message in particular media to reach your audience. It’s also important to identify goals for each medium, for example: “call to action” in the papers, brand awareness for television, and brand interactivity for the web, etc.

Marketing and advertising media integration is the corner stone of media synergy. Media synergy allows your message and budget to work harder for you. Media syergy is the principle that allows different media outlets to work together in one campaign or several campaigns.

*Note – since this is a wide topic, I will write several pieces to address the issue, so be sure to come back.

But what if you’re invested in mediums in transition. OK, let’s stop beating around the bush – what I mean is, what if you’re investing in newspapers and radio. With these mediums are on the decline, what do you do?

That giant sucking sound you hear is indeed the Internet swooping away consumers from radio, newspapers, and even TV. Even so, my philosophy is that newspapers and radio are not going away. Newspapers may have wiped out the town crier, but radio did not kill newspapers when it was first introduced, and TV did not bury radio. And while the Internet is, to this point, a peerless medium, and will surely drive consolidation among regional newspapers and radio stations, but by-and-large newspapers and radio are here to stay.

So if you’re invested in these media, make sure that your message resonates. You may have a smaller audience pool for your message, that’s why the quality of you message is key in these unchartered waters. Also, consider offers and bounce your advertising message to another medium like the web or the phone. For example, if you have an offer in your magazine ad, drive response to the web or phone so you can measure better. Now, we’ve got two outlets working harder for you. And I am assuming your website is optimized to get even a larger bang.

In the meantime, consider negotiating harder with outlets in transition, they don’t want to loose your business.

Share this:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn